SCIL Meeting Minutes
September 7, 2007
UCSD Biomedical Library
La Jolla, CA
Attendees:
Gayle Burrow (Claremont Colleges), Allie Carr (CSU San
Marcos), Alex Chappell (Claremont Colleges), April Cunningham (Saddleback
College), Judith Downie (CSU San Marcos), Katy French (Palomar College), Karen
Heskett (UC San Diego), Robin Lockerby (National University), Debbi Renfrow (UC
Riverside), Dominique Turnbow (UC San Diego), Duffy Tweedy (UC San Diego), Amy
Wallace (CSU Channel Islands), Kimberly Wilcox (Azusa Pacific University),
I.
Welcome and Introductions
II.
Agenda
Approval/Adjustment
III.
Minutes
April minutes were approved electronically and
Duffy Tweedy posted them to the SCIL website.
A. LOEX
Summary and Evaluations
The
LOEX planning report is being completed by the Conference Coordinators: Tracey
Mayfield, Duffy Tweedy, and Amy Wallace.
The Conference Proceedings will be published by the end of the year and
will be provided to conference attendees and available for sale to those who
did not attend.
V. New
Business
A.
SCIL Works
Dominique
Turnbow distributed the draft call for proposals for the upcoming SCIL Works
mini-conference. The theme is
"Putting Theory into Practice: The 'Why' Behind Instructional Strategies." Prospective dates for the event were
discussed. The call for proposals
and publicity for the event will be distributed on a timeline very similar to
the one used in 2006.
B.
SCIL Elections
Katy French distributed a timeline for the 2007
SCIL Elections and the form for the candidates' statements. Nominations for the offices of
Vice-chair/Chair-elect, Secretary, and Registrar will be accepted until October
12. Candidates and voters must be
CARL members.
C.
SCIL Facebook
Angela Boyd contacted Debbi Renfrow with a
suggestion that SCIL use Facebook to reach out to library school students. Boyd was not in attendance at the
meeting and discussion was tabled after attendees raised questions about the
best ways to use Facebook for promoting SCIL. More details of this suggestion will be sought.
VI. Tabled
Business
Assessment
Repository
After discussion, the attendees agreed that an
Assessment Repository would not work if it were to be maintained by an ad hoc
subcommittee. Possible
alternatives to this idea included developing an appointed or elected steering
committee position with the responsibility for maintaining a peer reviewed
Assessment Repository or using Facebook or similar networking sites to allow
librarians to list themselves as contacts on the subject of assessment. No immediate plan was made for future
efforts.
Minutes recorded by April Cunningham