|
Closing Address
On Being Wise Stewards...
Michael Gorman
President of LITA and Dean of Library Services
CSU, Fresno
MICHAEL
Gorman's speech centered around the notion of stewardship. This term derived
from the Old English word that combined "house" and "warden," or he who
is responsible for the safety and organization of a home (or by extension,
community). The King James version of the Bible suggests that a steward
provides something of value for future generations.
Librarians
as stewards need to be conscious of three areas:
- The preservation of the human record
- Care and quality of library education
- Good care of libraries
Gorman
noted that one of the qualities librarians lost in the current obsession
with "techno-babble" is their value in preserving the human record for following
generations. The historical role of libraries is being ignored. Librarians
and archivists (in the same church) have a unique role in transmitting culture.
If our culture was available only in digital format, the resulting crisis
would be momentous.
He
narrated the changes made to culture when the world moved from script to
print after Gutenberg's invention of movable type. The printing press did
a number of things to written records, including standardization of the
document, increased dissemination of documents, and a format that was both
fixed and durable. In a digital culture, on the other hand, you have multiple,
variable copies of documents, extensive distribution, but they are in a
completely unfixed, non-durable format. While tempting to view progress
as occurring in a nice linear curve, each new innovation is proving less
durable than that which came before. He spoke of the symbiotic relationship
between reputable authors and publishers and educated readers, each of whom
contributed to the overall health of the triangle. The mutability of electronic
documents, and the murkiness of an author's intent (Opinion? Fact?) pose
large problems. He noted that the only proven method for preserving culture
is to use good paper, provide multiple copies, and store carefully.
He
listed a variety of materials: books and journals, manuscripts, optical
disks, music scores, sound recordings, films and videos, microforms, and
digital resources. Many have improved in their durability but are dependent
on devices which are required to "read" them, and these devices change rapidly.
In particular, digital resources create many problems and give few solutions.
He
questioned librarians' unwillingness to provide judgment on what to preserve,
noting as an exception how well children's librarians do with selecting
quality children's literature, Many librarians shy from judgment based on
fears of accusations of censorship.
He
provided three strategies for dealing with the Internet:
- Ignore the question and give unlimited access for everyone
- Choose with care
- Choose resources, evaluate thoroughly, and preserve items with lasting value
He
bemoaned our overall lack of assertiveness in our profession, perhaps our
only major flaw.
He
went on to comment on the present disastrous nature of the curriculum being
offered at library schools. Many schools have dropped "library" from their
titles, and many seem caught in the movement between a traditionally female-dominated
service ethic and a male-dominated computer culture. ALA accreditation is
so loose as to be a farce, and schools cannot provide professionals with
education in professional core values the way medical and legal schools
do. He opined that there is no such thing as "information science." Those
who employ new librarians will increasingly have to examine very closely
the candidates' curriculum in graduate school to determine if candidates
have good grounding in library skills and values.
He
stated that accreditation is at the heart of a profession's identity, and
that the practice of good stewardship demands that graduate schools must
be revivified.
If
we are to succeed, we must do three things:
- Insure that future generations have effective, collaborative
methods to preserve culture
- Do good professional work and gain support from our communities
for this
- Revive library education by defining core values and insisting
on their inclusion in professional education
Ned Lee Fielden
San Francisco State University
|
|