|
Annual Conference Evaluation
Pauline D Manaka
University of California, Irvine
Ruth Gustafson
University of California, Davis
Some 236 participants attended the CARL 1999 Conference at Asilomar. 79 evaluation forms were completed. This makes the questionnaire return rate of 34%. Based on questions asked, the main goals of the evaluation were:
A. To gather input that will help in future conference planning
B. To know attendees' views about the conference location, Asilomar. [See Comments.]
METHODOLOGY
The
questionnaire designed by Locke Morrissey
was distributed at all meetings. It was structured to measure, on a scale
of 1 to 5, the following conference sections:
A. Keynote speakers
B. Panel or Open Discussions, Poster Session, and Roundtable Discussions
C. Interest Group Programs. The Interest Groups programs were:
Internet Showcase
CDIG--Shared Digital Collections
CCIG--Information Competencies
CALM/CARLDIG--Remote Users
CSUL--JACC
D. Costs and Services.
RESULTS AND ANALYSIS
A. The keynote speakers were ranked, with Cortez receiving the highest score in the Plenary Session. [See Figure 1.]
Speaker | Mean Score |
Cortez | 4.46 |
Crews | 4.11 |
Sullivan | 3.51 |
Gorman | 3.25 |
B. The scores for the Open Panel Discussions, ranked lower than those for keynote speakers. [See Figure 2.]
The Panel Discussions' scores are compared to the Poster Session's and Roundtables are all higher than average, making that a favorable representation.
Panel | Mean Score |
Copyright | 3.42 |
Evolving Structures | 2.60 |
Poster Session | 3.61 |
Roundtable | 2.77 |
C. The Interest Group sessions were rated less favorably overall. The highest ranked was the ABLE program, and the lowest, the Internet Showcase. [See Figure 3.]
Session | Mean Score | Std. Deviation |
Internet Showcase | 0.32 | 0.98 |
CDIG | 1.16 | 1.98 |
ABLE | 0.87 | 1.83 |
CCIG | 0.75 | 1.51 |
CALM/CARLDIG | 0.82 | 1.58 |
CSUL | 0.82 | 1.72 |
D. Conference Services rating were most favorable. Included are the process of registration, food costs and hotel costs. All were favorably evaluated. [See Figure 4.]
Item | Mean Score | Std. Deviation |
Registration | 4.18 | 1.23 |
Conference Cost | 4.32 | 0.88 |
Hotel Cost | 4.08 | 1.44 |
|
|